Candidate Competition and Voter Learning in Sequential Primary Elections: Theory and Evidence

نویسندگان

  • George Deltas
  • Mattias K. Polborn
چکیده

We develop a model of sequential presidential primaries in which several horizontally and vertically differentiated candidates compete against each other. Voters are incompletely informed about candidate valence and learn over time from election results in previous districts. We analyze the effects of learning about candidate quality, and the effects of candidate withdrawal on the vote shares, using data from the 2000-2012 Democratic and Republican presidential primaries. Consistent with the predictions of the model, the withdrawal of a candidate has a bigger effect on the vote shares of candidates in the same political position, vote variability declines over time in a pattern consistent with learning, and a tilt of the electorate towards a particular political position disproportionately increases the vote shares of the weak candidates espousing that position (relative to the strong candidates in that position). JEL Classification Numbers: D72, D60.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Learning and Coordination in the Presidential Primary System

In elections with three or more candidates, coordination among like-minded voters is an important problem. We analyze the trade-off between coordination and learning about candidate quality under different temporal election systems in the context of the U.S. presidential primary system. In our model, candidates with different policy positions and qualities compete for the nomination, and voters...

متن کامل

Primary Elections and the Quality of Elected Officials∗

In this paper we argue that the literature underestimates the value of primaries, because it focuses on overall average effects. The value of primaries is likely to vary across situations. We argue that primary elections are most needed in safe constituencies, where one party’s candidate will have a large advantage in the general election – even if that party’s candidate is “low quality”. In sa...

متن کامل

Informational Party Primaries and Strategic Ambiguity

While scholars have thoroughly explored the logic of two candidate electoral competition, much less has been accomplished in gaining an understanding of the role of party primaries. This paper presents an incomplete information model of primary and general elections and argues that party primaries do more than select party candidates. Party primaries serve an informational function. In an envir...

متن کامل

Reply to a comment on sequential elections and overlapping terms: voting for US senate

The phenomena of divided senate delegations, whereby several states are represented by senators from opposing political parties and differing political ideology, may at first blush seem at odds with the traditional median voter model. In a recent paper (Heckelman, 2000), I have modified the median voter framework by introducing two key institutional aspects, primary elections and staggered term...

متن کامل

Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 Do Voters Learn from Presidential Election Campaigns?

Theory: We present a model of voter campaign learning which is based on Bayesian learning models. This model assumes voters are imperfectly informed and that they incorporate new information into their existing perceptions about candidate issue positions in a systematic manner. Hypothesis: Additional information made available to voters about candidate issue positions during the course of a pol...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016